Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2021, 69(4), 519-531 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun.2021.047

Formulation for Development of Low- Cost Silvicultural Model for Production Forest in Aceh Province, Indonesia

Mahyuddin1, Abubakar Karim2, Sugianto2, Ashabul Anhar3
1 Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
2 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
3 Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia

Production forest is a forestry area used to produce forest products through Business Permit for Timber Forest Products Utilization (locally known as IUPHHK). Today, the main problems in the production forest industry management system are that the developed silvicultural system is still high in cost, and the mechanism of forest supervision and maintenance does not involve the forest communities. Therefore, it is necessary to make an effective and efficient design of a low-cost silvicultural model for production forests to be implemented in Aceh Province. This research aims to generate a low- cost silvicultural model for production forest in Aceh Province with a system approach using soft systems methodology (SSM). This research resulted in a low-cost silvicultural conceptual model for production forest and intervention strategies to be implemented by stakeholders to achieve the goals. Generally, the implementable intervention form is to develop synergy and partnership between the forest community and the IUPHHK-holder company in production forest management to run some production activities such as plantation process, security, and supervision. Moreover, participatory enhancement is necessary from the main actors: the government, the IUPHHK holder company, and the community by carrying out their duties and responsibilities according to their respective proportions.

Keywords: CATWOE, production forest, IUPHHK, conceptual model, soft system methodology

Received: January 19, 2021; Revised: June 23, 2021; Accepted: July 13, 2021; Published: September 1, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mahyuddin,, Karim, A., Sugianto,, & Anhar, A. (2021). Formulation for Development of Low- Cost Silvicultural Model for Production Forest in Aceh Province, Indonesia. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis69(4), 519-531. doi: 10.11118/actaun.2021.047
Download citation

References

  1. ANDRASMORO, D. and NUREKAWATI, E. E. 2017. Analysis of community plantation forest policies development towards the increase in community prosperity in West Borneo, and Special Region of Yogyakarta [in Indonesian: Analisis pengembangan kebijakan hutan tanaman rakyat (HTR) terhadap peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat di Kalimantan Barat dan D.I Yogyakarta]. Jurnal Swarnabhumi, 2(1): 36-44.
  2. ARIFANDY, M. I. and SIHALOHO, M. 2015. Effectiveness of Community Based Forest Management as Forest Resources Conflict Resolution [in Indonesian: Efektivitas Pengelolaan Hutan Bersama Masyarakat sebagai Resolusi Konflik Sumber Daya Hutan]. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 3(2): 147-158.
  3. AZWIR, A., JALALUDDIN, J. and IBRAHIM, I. 2017. Community role in maintaining forest sustainability as source of life [in Indonesian: Peranan masyarakat dalam menjaga kelestarian hutan sebagai sumber kehidupan]. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Akutansi, 3(1): 44-50.
  4. BADAN PUSAT STATISTIK (BPS). 2016. Profile of Bireuen Regency [in Indonesian: Profil Kabupaten Bireuen]. Bireuen (ID).
  5. BAHRUNI. 2011. Conduct study and Analysis on Economic Incentive Framework of SFM as Important option for Forest Based Climate Change Mitigation-to Reduce Emission from and by tropical forest. Jakarta: International Tropical Timber Organization.
  6. BARBER, C. V., MATTHEWS, E., BROWN, D., BROWN, T. H., CURRAN, L. and PLUME, C. 2002. The State of the Forest: Indonesia. World Resources Institute.
  7. BATUBARA, S. C. 2016. Design of Sustainable Supply Chain System Management of Marine Capture Fishery Industry [in Indonesian: Disain sistem manajemen rantai pasokan industri perikanan tangkap laut berkelanjutan]. Dissertation Thesis. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  8. BERGVALL-KAREBORN, B. 2002. Qualifying Function in SSM Modeling - a case study. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 15(4), 309-330. Go to original source...
  9. CHAZDON, R. L. and COE, F. G. 1999. Ethnobotany of woody species in second growth, old growth, and selectively logged forest of Noortheastern Costa Rica. Conserv. Biol, 13(6): 1312-1322. Go to original source...
  10. CHECKLAND, P. 2013. Soft Systems Methodology. In: GASS, S. I. and FU, M. C. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Boston, MA: Springer. Go to original source...
  11. CHECKLAND, P. and POULTER, J. 2010. Learning for action: a short definitive account of soft systems methodology, and its use for practitioners, teachers, and students. New York: Wiley. Go to original source...
  12. CHECKLAND, P. and SCHOLES, J. 1990. Soft System Methodology in Action. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  13. DAMAYATANTI, P. T. 2011. Forest Conservation Efforts through Community Based Forest Resources Management [in Indonesia: Upaya Pelestarian HutanMelalui Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Hutan Bersama Masyarakat]. Jurnal Komunitas, 2(1): 70-82.
  14. DARMANTO. 2014. Governance in management of protected forest (A study by using Soft Systems Methodology) [in Indonesia: Tata kelola dalam pengelolaan hutan lindung (Suatu Kajian dengan menggunakan Soft Systems Methodology)]. Dissertation Thesis. Tangerang Selatan (ID): Universitas Terbuka.
  15. DARUSMAN, D. and BAHRUNI. 2004. Economic Analysis of Sustainable Forest Management at Unit Management Level in Indonesia. ITTO Project No. PD 42/00/REV.1 (F). Jakarta: ITTO and APHI.
  16. EKAWATI, S., DWIPRABOWO, H., HARUN, M. K., HANDOYO, SALAKA, F. J., SUBEKTI, B. and RAHARJO, K. D. 2014. Synthesis of Integrative Research on Strengthening Forestry Governance [in Indonesian: Sintesis Penelitian Integratif Penguatan Tata Kelola Kehutanan]. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kehutanan, Pusat Litbang Perubahan Iklim dan Kebijakan.
  17. FADHIL, R., MAARIF, M. S., BANTACUT, T. and HERMAWAN, A. 2017. Human resource development strategy for Gayo coffee agroindustry in the ASEAN economic community [in Indonesian: Model strategi pengembangan sumber daya manusia agroindustri kopi Gayo dalam menghadapi masyarakat ekonomi ASEAN]. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 16(2), 141-155. Go to original source...
  18. FADHIL, R., QANYTAH, Q., HASTATI, D. Y. and MAARIF, M. S. 2018. Development Strategy for a Quality Management System of Gayo Coffee Agro-Industry Using Soft Systems Methodology. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 26(2): 168-178. Go to original source...
  19. FAKHRURRAZI. 2018. Analysis of Cacao Agroindustry Based Agrotourism Development in Pidie Jaya Regency Aceh Province [in Indonesian: Analisis Pengembangan Agrowisata Berbasis Agroindustri Kakao di Kabupaten Pidie Jaya Provinsi Aceh]. Thesis. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  20. FEARNSIDE, P. M. and GUIMARES, W. M. 1996. Carbon uptake by secondary forest in Brazilian Amazonia. For. Ecol. Management, 80(1-3): 35-46. Go to original source...
  21. GUNAWAN, K. S., BARKEY, R. A. and HAJAR, M. A. I. 2014. Program Implementation of Forest Community Resource Management in Perspective Village Community Development [in Indonesian: Implementasi Program Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Hutan Bersama Masyarakat dalam Perspektif Pemberdayaan Desa Hutan]. Program Pasca Universitas Hasanuddin.
  22. HAJRAH, KARTODIHARDJO, H. and NUGROHO, B. 2015. Effectiveness of log tester technical personnel in the administration of forest products (study of natural forest case in Central Borneo [in Indonesian: Efektivitas tenaga teknis penguji kayu bulat dalam penatausahaan hasil hutan di Borneo (studi kasus hutan alam Kalimantan Tengah)). Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan, 2(3): 191-201. Go to original source...
  23. HAKIM, I. 2009. The Study of Financing for Industrial Plantation Forest [in Indonesia: Kajian pembiayaan pembangunan hutan tanaman Industri. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 6(2): 135-158. Go to original source...
  24. HARUN, M. and DWIPRABOWO, H. 2014. Resolution model of land conflict in Banjar production forest management unit model [in Indonesian: Model resolusi konflik lahan di kesatuan pemangkuan hutan produksi model Banjar]. JURNAL Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 11(4): 265-280. Go to original source...
  25. HEART OF BORNEO (HB). 2014. Sustainable Forest Management [in Indonesian: Pengelolaan Hutan Lestari]. Heart of Borneo. [Online]. Available at: http//heartofborneo.or.id/id/sustainabledevelopment/detail/8/pengelolaan-hutan-lestari-phl [Accessed: 2014, December 15].
  26. HIDAYAH, A. 2012. Conflict Management of Community Based Forest Resources Management (Case study: Concept of PHBM at KPH of Randublatung, Blora Regency, Province of Central Java [in Indonesian: Manajemen Konflik Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Hutan Berbasis Komunitas (Studi Kasus: Konsep PHBM di KPH Randublatung, Kabupaten Blora, Provinsi Jawa Tengah)]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  27. MARGITAWATY, B. 2004. Phenomenon of Exchange in Collaborative Forest Management (Case study: Implementation of PHBM in Puncak Village Cigugur District and Linggasana Village Cilimus District Kuningan Regency Province of West Java) [in Indonesian: Fenomena Pertukaran dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Secara Kolaboratif (Studi Kasus: Implementasi PHBM di Desa Puncak Kecamatan Cigugur dan Desa Linggasana Kecamatan Cilimus Kabupaten Kuningan Provinsi Jawa Barat)] Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  28. MARTIN, E. 2008. Application of soft system methodology for management of conflict-prone forest areas: case of Benakat research forest, South Sumatera) [in Indonesian: Aplikasi metodologi sistem lunak untuk pengelolaan kawasan hutan rawan konflik: kasus hutan penelitian Benakat, Sumatera Selatan]. Dissertation Thesis. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  29. NASIKH. 2009. Community Participation in the Forest Management at Forest and Land Rehabilitation Activities (Gerhan) Pasuruan East Java [in Indonesian: Partisipasi Masyarakat pada Pengelolaan Hutan di Kawasan Gerakan Rehabilitasi Hutan dan Lahan (Gerhan) Pasuruan Jawa Timur]. Jurnal Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik, 22(2): 33-45.
  30. NGABDANI, M., MURYANI, C. and SUDARYANTO, R. 2015. Community Participation in the Implementation of Community Based Forest Management (PHBM) Program in Desa Girimulyo Jogorogo District Ngawi Regency [in Indonesian: Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pelaksanaan Program Pengelolaan Hutan Bersama Masyarakat (PHBM) di Desa Girimulyo Kecamatan Jogorogo Kabupaten Ngawi]. Jurnal GeoEco, 1(1): 58-66.
  31. NOVAYANTI, W. D., BANUWA, I. S., SAFE'I, R., WULANDARI, C. and FEBRYANO, I. G. 2017. Analysis of Factors Affecting Community Perception in Community Plantation Forest Development at KPH of Gedong [in Indonesian: Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Persepsi Masyarakat dalam Pembangunan Hutan Tanaman Rakyat pada KPH Gedong]. Jurnal Hutan dan Masyarakat, 9(2): 61-74. Go to original source...
  32. NUGRAHA, A. 2004. Welcoming Changes Towards Forestry Sector Revitalization [in Indonesian: Menyongsong Perubahan Menuju Revitalisasi Sektor Kehutanan]. Tangerang: Penerbit Wana Aksara.
  33. NURROCHMAT, D. R. 2005. The Impacts of Regional Autonomy on Political Dynamics, Socio-Economics and Forest Degradation. Case of Jambi-Indonesia. Goettingen: Cuvillier Verlag.
  34. PAPILO, P. and MAARIF, M. S. 2015. Policy Model of Bioenergy Agroindustry Management in the Perspective of Environmental Sustainability (Soft Systems Methodology as an Approach) [in Indonesian: Model Kebijakan Pengelolaan Agroindustri Bioenergi dalam Perspektif Kelestarian Lingkungan (Soft Systems Methodology sebagai Suatu Pendekatan)]. Jurnal PASTI, 9(1): 10-18.
  35. PAYUGALLO, M. S. 2010. Diameter growth distribution model of Meranti tree in the selective cutting and line planting silvicultural system (case study: case at IUPHHK of PT. Erna Djuliawati Central Borneo [in Indonesian: Model distribusi pertumbuhan diameter tanaman meranti pada sistem silvikultur tebang pilih tanam jalur (studi kasus di IUPHHK PT. Erna Djuliawati. Kalimantan tengah)]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  36. PITRI, R. M. N. 2012. Financial Incentive of Sustainable Natural Production Forest Management from Scheme of REDD+ Carbon Trading [in Indonesia: Insentif finansial pengelolaan hutan alam produksi lestari dari perdagangan karbon skema REDD+]. Thesis. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  37. RUHIMAT, I. S. 2010. Implementation of Forest Management Unit (KPH) Policies in Banjar Regency [in Indonesian: Implementasi kebijakan kesatuan pengelolaan hutan (KPH) Di Kabupaten Banjar]. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan 7(3): 169-178. Go to original source...
  38. SOLICHIN and RIYANTO, B. 2010. Measurement of Carbon in Production Forest Area through IHMB [in Indonesian: Pengukuran Karbon di Kawasan Hutan Produksi melalui IHMB]. Available at: http://forclime.org/merang/Pengukuran%20Karbon%20di%20Kawasan%20IUPHHK.pdf [Accessed: 2021, July 20].
  39. SUJARWO, W. and DARMA, I. D. P. 2011. Vegetation Analysis and Estimation of Carbon Stock in around Mountain and Lake Batur Kintamani Bali [in Indonesian: Analisis vegetasi dan pendugaan karbon tersimpan pada pohon di kawasan sekitar gunung dan danau Batur Kintamani Bali]. Jurnal Bumi Lestari, 11(1): 85-92.
  40. SUPARNA, N. 2017. HPH role in maintaining the continuity of natural forest [in Indonesian: Peran HPH dalam menjaga keberlanjutan hutan alam]. Lestari Paper No. 03. USAID.
  41. SUWARDI, A. B., MUKHTAR, E. and SYAMSUARDI. 2013. Species Composition and Carbon Stock in Tropical Lowland Forest, Ulu Gadut, West Sumatra [in Indonesian: Komposisi jenis dan cadangan karbon di hutan tropis dataran rendah, Ulu Gadut, Sumatera Barat]. Berita Biologi, 12(2): 169-176.
  42. TANJUNG, N. S., SADONO, D. and WIBOWO, C. T. 2017. Community Participation Rate in Nagari Forest Management in West Sumatera [in Indonesian: Tingkat Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Nagari di Sumatera Barat]. Jurnal Penyuluhan, 13(1): 14-30. Go to original source...
  43. UNITED NATIONS. 2015. Sustainable Development Goals. [Online]. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics [Accessed: 2021, July 20].
  44. WIDIYANTO, J., HAIRUL BASRI, H. and DAHLAN. 2012. Potential and Strategy of Community Forest Development in Bireuen Regency Aceh Province [in Indonesian: Potensi dan strategi pengembangan hutan rakyat di Kabupaten Bireuen Provinsi Aceh. Jurnal Manajemen Sumberdaya Lahan, 1(1): 1-9.
  45. WORLD BANK. 2009. Investing in A More Sustainable Indonesia. Country Environmental Analysis. Report No. 50762-ID. The World Bank.
  46. WORLD BANK. 2009. Roots for Good Forest Outcomes: an Analytical Framework for Governance Reforms. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  47. YASMAN, I., NURROCHMAT, D., SEPTIANI, Y. and LASMINI. 2013. Role of Natural Production Forest Management in the Climate Change (REDD+, Sustainable Forest Management and RIL-C) [in Indonesian: Peran Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi Alam dalam Perubahan Iklim (REDD+, Pengelolaan Hutan Lestari dan RIL-C)]. The Nature Conservancy Program TERESTRIAL Indonesia.
  48. YAYASAN SARANA WANA JAYA (YSWJ). 2017. Production Forest Management [in Indonesia: Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi]. Direktorat Kajian Strategis dan Kebijakan Pertanian Instut Pertanian Bogor dan Yayasan Sarana Wana Jaya.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.