Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2021, 69(3), 345-356 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun.2021.032

The Impact of Brand on Consumer Preferences of Milk in Online Purchases: Conjoint Analysis Approach

©árka Velčovská1, Fridrik Rafn Larsen2
1 Department of Marketing and Business, Faculty of Economics, V©B-Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 2172/15, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic
2 Faculty of Business Administration, School of Social Sciences, University of Iceland, Sæmundargata 2, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland

The aim of the paper is to determine preferences of Czech consumers in online shopping of long-life semi-skimmed milk and to identify the importance of milk attributes in their online buying process, with focus on brand. Specifically, the study is focusing on: 1) identification of the importance of a brand in comparison with packaging, price and quality label in online purchases, 2) finding milk with maximum utility for consumers, and 3) revealing the most preferred brand of milk when other attributes stay the same. Data were collected in September 2018 through an online survey, using full-profile conjoint analysis. A total of 185 respondents 18+ living in the Czech Republic, selected by quota sampling method concerning the role of men and women in household food purchases, completed a questionnaire. Research results reveal that brand is the most important extrinsic quality cue affecting milk choice in online purchases, with relative importance 50.3%. The importance of other surveyed attributes is balanced, with 18.6% for packaging, 17.6% for price and 13.5% for quality label. Comparison of consumer preferences for three different brands of milk with otherwise the same attributes revealed the highest preference for brand coming from the region. A familiar brand plays a key role in maintaining a competitive position in the online grocery market.

Keywords: brand, conjoint analysis, consumer behaviour, consumer preferences, milk market, online grocery shopping, product profile, quality cues, survey

Received: March 13, 2021; Revised: April 23, 2021; Accepted: April 26, 2021; Published: July 1, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Velčovská, ©., & Larsen, F.R. (2021). The Impact of Brand on Consumer Preferences of Milk in Online Purchases: Conjoint Analysis Approach. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis69(3), 345-356. doi: 10.11118/actaun.2021.032
Download citation

References

  1. ANDREWS, R. and CURRIM, I. 2004. Behavioural differences between consumers attracted to shopping online versus traditional supermarkets: implications for enterprise design and marketing strategy. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 1(1): 38-61. Go to original source...
  2. ANESBURY, Z., NENYCZ-THIEL, M., DAWES, J. and KENNEDY, R. 2016. How do shoppers behave online? An observational study of online grocery shopping. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. An International Research Review, 15(3): 261-270. Go to original source...
  3. BANERJEE, T. and BANERJEE, A. 2018. Web content analysis of online grocery shopping web sites in India. International Journal of Business Analytics, 5(4): 61-73. Go to original source...
  4. BAUEROVÁ, R. 2018. Consumers' decisionmaking in online grocery shopping: the impact of services offered and delivery conditions. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(5): 1239-1247. Go to original source...
  5. BAUEROVÁ, R. and BRACINÍKOVÁ, V. 2021. Customer's choice of purchasing channel: Do channel characteristic, brand, and loyalty matter when shopping in hybrid retailers? Sustainability, 13: 2453. Go to original source...
  6. CASWELL, J. A. 1998. Valuing the benefits and costs of improved food safety and nutrition. Australian Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics, 42(4): 409-474. Go to original source...
  7. CHU, J., ARCE-URRIZA, M., CEBOLLADA-CALVO, J. J. and CHINTAGUNTA, P. 2010. An empirical analysis of shopping behavior across online and offline channels for grocery products: the moderating effects of household and product characteristics. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24(4): 251-268. Go to original source...
  8. ČTK: České noviny. 2021. Internet shopping has jumped due to the pandemic [in Czech: Nakupování přes internet kvůli pandemii skokově vzrostlo]. ČTK: České noviny. [Online]. Available at: https://www.ceskenoviny.cz/zpravy/csu-nakupovani-pres-internet-kvuli-pandemii-skokove-vzrostlo/2012878 [Accessed: 2021, April 16].
  9. DOMINICI, A., BONCINELLI, F., GERINI, F. and MARONE, E. 2021. Determinants of online food purchasing: The impact of socio-demographic and situational factors. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60: 102473. Go to original source...
  10. ECOMMERCE NEWS. 2020. UK leads Europe in embracing online grocery shopping. Ecommerce News. [Online]. Available at: https://ecommercenews.eu/uk-leads-europe-in-embracing-online-grocery-shopping/ [Accessed: 2021, April 20].
  11. ESPEJEL, J., HERRERA, C. F. and FLAVIÁN, C. 2007. The role of intrinsic and extrinsic quality attributes on consumer behaviour for traditional food products. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 17(6): 681-701. Go to original source...
  12. EUROMONITOR INTERNATIONAL. 2020. COVID-19 Effect on packaged food. Euromonitor International. [Online]. Available at: https://go.euromonitor.com/white-paper-packaged-food-2020-COVID-19-Effect-On-Packaged-Food.html?utm_source=PressRelease&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=CT_WP_20_04_30_COVID-19%20Effect%20on%20Packaged%20Food [Accessed: 2020, November 21].
  13. GAVUROVÁ, B., BACIK, R., FEDORKO, R. and NASTI©IN, L. 2018. The customer's brand experience in the light of selected performance indicators in the social media environment. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(2): 72-84. Go to original source...
  14. GREBITUS, C. 2008. Food quality from the consumer's perspective: An empirical analysis of perceived pork quality. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag.
  15. HAZUCHOVÁ, N., ANTO©OVÁ, I. and STÁVKOVÁ, J. 2020. Food wastage as a display of consumer behaviour. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(2): 51-66. Go to original source...
  16. HENG, Y., GAO, Z., JIANG, Y. and CHEN, X. 2018. Exploring hidden factors behind online food shopping from Amazon reviews: A topic mining approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 42: 161-168. Go to original source...
  17. IBM. 2019. IBM SPSS Conjoint. IBM. [Online]. Available at: https://www.ibm.com/cz-en/marketplace/spss-conjoint [Accessed: 2020, January 19].
  18. HILLEN, J. 2021. Psychological pricing in online food retail. British Food Journal, ahead of print. Go to original source...
  19. INTERNATIONAL FOOD INFORMATION COUNCIL FOUNDATION. 2019. New research: Evaluating online grocery shopping trends. Food Insight. [Online]. Available at: https://foodinsight.org/new-research-evaluating-online-grocery-shopping-trends/ [Accessed: 2020, October 12].
  20. KOPÁČEK, J. 2018. Current situation on the milk market. Czech-Moravian Dairy Association [in Czech: Současná situace na trhu s mlékem. Českomoravský svaz mlékárenský]. [Presentation]. Available at: http://www.milcom-as.cz/upload/soubory/obrazky/cicvarek/praha/2018/den_vum/2018_-_01_-_soucasna_situace_na_trhu_s_mlekem_(kop%C3%A1%C4%8Dek_-_%C4%8Dmsm).pdf [Accessed: 2018, July 21].
  21. KPMG. 2016. Shopping habits 2016 - Two thirds of people buy more than they planned [in Czech: Nákupní zvyklosti 2016 - Dvě třetiny lidí nakoupí více, neľ plánovaly]. Gastro & Hotel. [Online]. Available at: http://gastroahotel.cz/rubriky/novinky-z-gastronomie/nakupni-zvyklosti-2016-dve-tretiny-lidi-nakoupi-vice-nez-planovaly/ [Accessed: 2018, July 16].
  22. KPMG. 2018. Shopping habits 2018 [in Czech: Nákupní zvyklosti 2018]. KPMG. [Online]. Available at: https://home.kpmg/cz/cs/home/pro-media/tiskove-zpravy/2018/11/nakupni-zvyklosti-2018-obaly-a-trideni.html [Accessed: 2018, July 16].
  23. KPMG. 2020. Every sixth Czech buys groceries online [in Czech: Kaľdý ąestý Čech nakupuje potraviny online]. KPMG. [Online]. Available at: https://home.kpmg/cz/cs/home/pro-media/tiskove-zpravy/2020/02/kazdy-sesty-kupuje-potraviny-online.html [Accessed: 2021, April 12].
  24. LAI, J., MORGAN, S., KASSAS, B., KROPP, J. and GAO, Z. 2021. Spending of economic stimulus payments and changes in food purchasing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Choices, 25(3): 756.
  25. LOKETKRAWEE, P. and BHATIASEVI, V. 2018. Elucidating the behavior of consumers toward online grocery shopping: The role of shopping orientation. Journal of Internet Commerce, 17(4): 418-445. Go to original source...
  26. MALHOTRA, N. K. 2019. Marketing Research. An applied orientation. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  27. MEYERDING, S. G. H., BAUCHROWITZ, A. and LEHBERGER, M. 2019. Consumer preferences for beer attributes in Germany: A conjoint and latent class approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 47: 229-240. Go to original source...
  28. NEERAJ, P., AVINASH, T., DEVENDRA, J. and SAPTRSHI R. 2019. Does price tolerance depend upon the type of product in e-retailing? Role of customer satisfaction, trust, loyalty, and perceived value. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 28(6): 522-541. Go to original source...
  29. OLSON, J. C. and JACOBY, J. 1972. Cue utilization in the quality perception process. In: Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research. Association for Consumer Research, 3-5 November. Chicago, IL: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 167-179.
  30. OUDE OPHUIS, P. A. M. and VAN TRIJP, H. C. M. 1995. Perceived quality: A market driven and consumer-oriented approach. Food Quality and Preference, 6(3): 177-183. Go to original source...
  31. PIROTH, P., RITTER, M. S. and RUEGER-MUCK, E. 2020. Online grocery shopping adoption: do personality traits matter? British Food Journal, 122(3): 957-975. Go to original source...
  32. PITTS, J. S. B., NG, S. W., BLITSTEIN, J. L., GUSTAFSON, A. and NICULESCU, M. 2018. Online grocery shopping: promise and pitfalls for healthier food and beverage purchases. Public Heath Nutrition, 21(18): 3360-3376. Go to original source...
  33. RAO, V. R. 2014. Applied Conjonit Analysis. Berlin: Springer. Go to original source...
  34. RONDONI, A., MILLAN, E. and ASIOLI, D. 2021. Consumers' preferences for intrinsic and extrinsic product attributes of plant-based eggs: an exploratory study in the United Kingdom and Italy. British Food Journal, ahead-of-print. Go to original source...
  35. SADÍLEK, T. 2019. Consumer Preferences Regarding food quality labels: The case of Czechia. British Food Journal, 121(10): 2508-2523. Go to original source...
  36. SAUNDERS, N. 2018. Online grocery & food shopping statistics. OneSpace. [Online]. Available at: https://www.onespace.com/blog/2018/08/online-grocery-food-shopping-statistics/ [Accessed: 2020, November 14].
  37. SEMERÁDOVÁ, Z. 2018. Czechs and dairy products [in Czech: Čeąi a mléčné výrobky]. Mediář. [Online]. Available at: https://www.mediar.cz/cesi-a-mlecne-vyrobky-u-mleka-vede-tatra-u-dalsich-produktu-madeta/ [Accessed: 2018, August 13].
  38. SYMMANK, C. 2019. Extrinsic and intrinsic food product attributes in consumer and sensory research: literature review and quantification of the findings. Management Review Quarterly, 69: 39-74. Go to original source...
  39. SZIF. 2021. Klasa products [in Czech: Výrobky Klasa]. Klasa. [Online]. Available at: https://www.eklasa.cz/ [Accessed: 2021, April 15].
  40. ©ONTAITĖ-PETKEVIČIENĖ, M. 2020. Customer-based brand equity creation for online grocery stores. Research for Rural Development, 35: 199-206. Go to original source...
  41. THE DOBNEY CORPORATION LIMITED. 2020. Conjoint analysis. Dobney.com. [Online]. Available at: http://www.dobney.com/Conjoint/Conjoint_analysis.htm [Accessed: 2020, July 21].
  42. WANG, O. and Somogyi, S. 2018. Consumer adoption of online food shopping in China. British Food Journal, 120(12): 2868-2884. Go to original source...
  43. ZARLING, P. 2018. Consumers are slow to adapt to online grocery shopping. Grocery Dive. [Online]. Available at: https://www.grocerydive.com/news/grocery--consumers-are-slow-to-adapt-to-online-grocery-shopping/534067/ [Accessed: 2020, February 2].

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.