Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2020, 68(6), 995-1009 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun202068060995

Risks of Regional Tax Systems and Their Portfolio Decomposition: The Case of Modern Russia

Marina Malkina, Rodion Balakin
Center of Macro and Microeconomics, Institute of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod, 23 Prospekt Gagarina, 603950 Nizhni Novgorod, Russia

The purpose of this paper is an assessment of the risk of regional tax systems at different levels of the budget system (consolidated, federal, regional and local), decomposition of this risk by sources (various taxes and tax groups) and the isolation of internal (related to own tax return volatility) and external (related to the correlation of tax returns volatility) risk components. Using the portfolio approach, we measured and decomposed the risk of tax systems of 80 constituent entities of the Russian Federation in 2006-2017. As a result, we found a weak positive relationship between the risk and return of the regional tax systems at all budget levels. By comparing the structure of return and risk of regional tax systems, we identified taxes - risk dampers and taxes - risk enhancers, and estimated the overall level of imbalance in regional tax systems at the studied budget levels. It allowed us to conclude about the effectiveness of diversification of regional tax systems, the advisability of combining different taxes in a single portfolio, or transferring them to another level of the budget system.

Keywords: Russian tax system, tax return, tax risk, portfolio approach, decomposition, levels of budget system, diversification, imbalance
Grants and funding:

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project No. 19-010-00716, "Development of methodology and non-traditional methods for assessing financial instability".

Received: March 15, 2020; Accepted: October 29, 2020; Published: December 17, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Malkina, M., & Balakin, R. (2020). Risks of Regional Tax Systems and Their Portfolio Decomposition: The Case of Modern Russia. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis68(6), 995-1009. doi: 10.11118/actaun202068060995
Download citation

References

  1. ALBRECHT, W. G. 2013. Managing Tax Revenue Volatility. Conference Proceedings of the International Academy of Business and Public Administration Disciplines, 27(1): 311-318.
  2. CARROL, D. 2009. Diversifying Municipal Government Revenue Structures: Fiscal Illusion or Instability? Public Budgeting and Finance, 29(1): 27-48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5850.2009.00922.x Go to original source...
  3. CORNIA, G. C. and NELSON, R. D. 2010. State Tax Revenue Growth and Volatility. Regional Economic Development. Journal of Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 6(1): 23-58.
  4. CORNIA, G. C., JOHNSON, R. B. and NELSON, R. D. 2016. Personal Income Tax Revenue Growth and Volatility. Public Finance Review, 454: 458-483. Go to original source...
  5. DAUCHY, E. P. and BALDING, C. 2013. Federal Income Tax Revenue Volatility Since 1966. Working Papers of Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR) No. w0198. CERIF. Go to original source...
  6. DELI, Y., RODRIGUEZ, A. G., KOSTARAKOS, I. and VARTHALITIS, P. 2018. Dynamic tax revenue buoyancy estimates for a panel of OECD countries. Papers WP592. Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
  7. FELIX, R. A. 2008. The Growth and Volatility of State Tax Revenue Sources in the Tenth District. Economic Review of Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 3: 63-88.
  8. FITZGERALD, K. and BEDOGNI, J. 2019. Examining the Volatility of Ireland's Tax Base in the Paradigm of Modern Portfolio Theory. The Economic and Social Review, 50(3): 429-458.
  9. FRICKE, H. and SUSSMUTH, B. 2014. Growth and Volatility of Tax Revenues in Latin America. World Development, 54: 114-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.07.007 Go to original source...
  10. GARRETT, T. A. 2009. Evaluating state tax revenue variability: a portfolio approach. Applied Economics Letters, 16(3): 243-246. DOI: 10.1080/13504850601018403 Go to original source...
  11. KRIZ, K. A. 2014. Improving Revenue Volatility Estimates Using Time-Series Decomposition Methods. In: 26th ABFM Annual Conference. October 2-4, 2014, Grand Rapids, MI. Association for Budgeting and Financial Management.
  12. LIAPIS, K., ROVOLIS, A. and GALANOS, C. 2014. The Tax Regimes of the EU Countries: Trends, Similarities and Differences. In: KARASAVVOGLOU, A. and POLYCHRONIDOU, P. (Eds.). Economic Crisis in Europe and the Balkans: Contributions to Economics. Heidelberg: Springer. Go to original source...
  13. MALKINA, M. Y. 2016. Evaluation of the Factors of Russian Regions' Convergence / Divergence in the Level of Budget Provision Based on the Decomposition of the Theil - Bernoulli Index [in Russian: Ocenka faktorov konvergencii / divergencii rossijskih regionov po urovnyu byudzhetnoj obespechennosti na osnove dekompozicii indeksov Tejla - Bernulli]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 3: 16-37. DOI: 10.14530/se.2016.3.016-037 Go to original source...
  14. MALKINA, M. Y. 2017. Influence of the industrial structure of economy on the risk level of Russian regions' tax systems. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 65(6): 2025-2035. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201765062025 Go to original source...
  15. MALKINA, M. Y. and BALAKIN, R. V. 2015. Correlation Assessment of Tax System Risk and Profitability in the Russian Regions [in Russian: Ocenka vzaimosvyazi riska i dohodnosti nalogovoj sistemy v regionah Rossii]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 3: 241-255. DOI: 10.17059/2015-3-20 Go to original source...
  16. MALKINA, M. Y. and BALAKIN, R. V. 2017. Tax system risk and yield assessments based on sectorial, regional and mixed-mode portfolios [in Russian: Ocenka riska i dohodnosti nalogovyh sistem na osnove otraslevogo, regional'nogo i smeshannogo portfelej]. Financy i credit [Finance and credit], 23(47): 2823-2842. DOI: 10.24891/fc.23.47.2823 Go to original source...
  17. MARKOWITZ, H. 1952. Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1): 77-91. Go to original source...
  18. MISHUSTIN, M. V. 2016. Factors of growth of tax revenues: a macroeconomic approach [in Russian: Faktory rosta nalogovykh dokhodov: makroekonomicheskiy podkhod]. Economic Policy [Ekonomicheskaya politika], 11(5): 8-27.
  19. SALIN, V., PATRON, E. and STALLMANN, J. I. 2004. Rainy Day Funds for Municipalities Estimated with Value at Risk. In: North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International. Seattle, WA.
  20. SEEGERT, N. 2012. Optimal Taxation with Volatility. A Theoretical and Empirical Decomposition. University of Michigan, MI: Ann Arbor.
  21. SEEGERT, N. 2017. Optimal tax portfolios: An estimation of Government Tax Revenue Minimum-Variance Frontiers. [Online]. Michigan University. Available at: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~seegert/papers/OptimalTaxPortfolios_Seegert.pdf [Accessed: 2020, January 22].
  22. SEYFRIED, W. and PANTUOSCO, L. 2003. Estimating the sensitivity of state tax revenue to cyclical and wealth effects. Journal of Economics and Finance, 27(1): 114-124. DOI: 10.1007/BF02751594 Go to original source...
  23. SHARPE, W. F. 1970. Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  24. SHORROCKS, A. 1982. Inequality Decomposition by Factor Components. Econometrica, 50(1): 193-211. DOI: 10.2307/1912537 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.