Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2020, 68(5), 885-899 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun202068050885

Per Capita Income Inequality in Czech Households Before, During and After the Economic and Financial Crisis

Markéta Hnízdilová, Václav Adamec
Department of Statistics and Operation Analysis, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The study tackles the issue of distribution inequality in equalized per capita income in households defined by multiple grouping criteria in the Czech Republic before, during and after the economic and financial crisis. The factors were economic status of the household head, number of children, education and the NUTS 3 administrative regions. Interval grouped per capita income data assembled within the EU-SILC framework via quota sampling were received from czso.cz for 2008, 2012 and 2016. Indicators of income level, variation, quantiles, medial and Gini index were calculated for the respective household groups. Income concentration in the Czech Republic is considerably low among OECD states and still decreasing due to government social and economic policy and favourable phase of the economic cycle. The largest income inequality was detected in the self-employed, jobless and qualified employees, households with 3 or more children, single-parent families with dependants, households with one or both tertiary educated parents or households residing in Prague or Středočeský region. The threat of poverty is imminent in the jobless, economically inactive pensioners, unqualified labourers and households with 3 or more children. Geographically, the poverty affects households mostly in Moravskoslezský or Ústecký regions. Government measures evidently helped reduce income inequality, poverty and social exclusion in Ústecký region in 2008. The least affected regions by poverty were Prague and Středočeský region. Significant differences in income level or concentration of income distributions by regional and other household grouping criteria were revealed.

Keywords: equalized per capita income, inequality, Gini index, LSDV model, Scheffé test, quartiles, medial
Grants and funding:

The authors appreciate kind assistance of the Czech Statistical Office, who provided data for this study. Thanks are also expressed to the anonymous reviewer for comments and suggestions that helped improve the paper.

Received: August 29, 2019; Accepted: September 4, 2020; Published: November 1, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hnízdilová, M., & Adamec, V. (2020). Per Capita Income Inequality in Czech Households Before, During and After the Economic and Financial Crisis. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis68(5), 885-899. doi: 10.11118/actaun202068050885
Download citation

References

  1. ATKINSON, A. B. 2016. Ekonomika nerovnosti. BizBooks.
  2. BALTAGI, B. H. 2005. Econometric analysis of panel data. 3rd Edition. London: John Wiley & Sons.
  3. BELABED, C. A. and HAKE, M. 2018. Income inequality and trust in national governments in central, eastern and southeastern Europe. Working Papers No. 222. Austrian Central Bank.
  4. BRÁZDILOVÁ, M. and ©VARCOVÁ, P. 2015. Income inequality by highest attained education in the Czech Republic. Statistika: Statistics and Economy Journal, 95(4): 5-16.
  5. BROWN, M. C. 1994. Using Gini-style indices to evaluate the spatial patterns of health practitioners; theoretical considerations and an application based on the Alberta data. Social Science and Medicine, 38(9): 1243-1256. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90189-9 Go to original source...
  6. BIRČIAKOVÁ, N., STÁVKOVÁ, J. and ANTO©OVÁ, V. 2013. Income (in)justice in the Czech Republic. Danube, 4(3): 185-199. Go to original source...
  7. CHARLES-COLL, J. A. 2011. Understanding income inequality: concept, causes and measurement. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 1(3): 17-28.
  8. COWELL, F. A. 2000. Measurement of inequality. In: ATKINSON, A. B. and BOURGUIGNON, F. (Eds.). Handbook of Income Distribution. Amsterdam: North Holland. Go to original source...
  9. DE MENDIBURU, F. 2020. Agricolae: Statistical procedures for agricultural research. R package version 1.3-3. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae [Accessed: 2020, June 15].
  10. GRAAFLAND, J. and LOUS, B. 2018. Economic freedom, income inequality and life satisfaction in OECD countries. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(7): 2071-2093. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-017-9905-7 Go to original source...
  11. LONGFORD, N. T., PITTAU, M. G., ZELLI, R. and MASSARI, R. 2010. Measures of poverty and inequality in the countries and regions of EU. Working papers 182. ECINEQ. Society for the study of economic inequality.
  12. MALÁ, Z. and ČERVENÁ, G. 2012. The relation and development of expenditure inequality and income inequality of Czech households. Economic Annals, 57(192): 55-78. DOI: 10.2298/EKA1292055M Go to original source...
  13. MINAŘÍK, B., BORŮVKOVÁ, J. and VYSTRČIL, M. 2013. Analýzy v regionálním rozvoji. Praha: Professional Publishing.
  14. OTT, L. R. 1993. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. 4th Edition. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.
  15. PETRÚ©EK, I. 2018. Perceptions of income inequality and preferences regarding income distribution in the Czech Republic [in Czech: Vnímání příjmových nerovností a preference ohledně rozdělení příjmů v České republice]. Politická ekonomie, 66(5): 550-568. DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1209 Go to original source...
  16. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  17. SARKAR, D. 2008. Lattice: multivariate data visualization with R. New York: Springer. Go to original source...
  18. SCHEFFÉ, H. 1959. The analysis of variance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  19. STÁVKOVÁ, J. and ANTO©OVÁ, V. 2013. Income situation and living conditions of inhabitants in the Czech Republic. Folia Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 1st Edition. Brno: Mendel University in Brno.
  20. TICHÁ, M. 2015. Česká ekonomika na prahu 21. století v kontextu společenského vývoje. 2nd Edition. Ostrava: V©B-TU Ostrava.
  21. WILKINSON, R. G. and PICKETT, K. 2010. The spirit level: why equality is better for everyone. London: Penguin Books.
  22. ZEILEIS, A. 2014. ineq: Measuring inequality, concentration and poverty. R package version 0.2-13. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=ineq [Accessed: 2019, July 10].

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.