Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2017, 65(2), 727-736 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201765020727

Effect of Chia and Teff Supplement on Dietary Fibre Content, Non-fermented Dough and Bread Characteristics from Wheat and Wheat-Barley Flours

Ivan ©vec, Marie Hru¹ková
Department of Carbohydrates and Cereals, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic

To elevate dietary fibre content in wheat bread, two additions of barley flour were tested (30 % and 50 %), and further 5 % or 10 % of chia or teff wholemeals. Chia elevated dietary fibre content more effectively than teff did (up to 6.41 % and 4.29 %, respectively). Non-gluten nature of proteins in non-traditional raw materials also affected farinograph, amylograph and mixolab proof results. Water absorption increased about 10 % in total, especially owing to teff presence in composite flour. All three alternative crops decelerated dough development and prolonged its stability, but dough softening degree depended on their combination. Higher water absorption was reflected in viscosity rise during amylograph testing. Using mixolab equipment, significantly more accurate differentiation of tested composites was reached, both in phase of dough kneading and registration of viscosity during heating and cooling. Contrary to this, any statistically verifiable difference was observed between chia or teff wholemeal variants from white of dark seeds. By variance analysis, some rheological parameters (dough softening degree, torque point C5, mixolab energy) together with specific bread volume were identified as principal for samples distinguishing. In terms of flour and bread quality, barley flour portion had a prevailing effect for chia tri-composites. Reversely, quality of flour blends containing teff was dependent on both barley flour and teff wholemeal portion and type.

Keywords: wheat composite flour, chia and teff wholemeal, mixolab, bread, PCA
Grants and funding:

The study was granted by the project No. QI 111 B053 of the NAZV, Czech Republic.

Prepublished online: April 30, 2017; Published: May 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
©vec, I., & Hru¹ková, M. (2017). Effect of Chia and Teff Supplement on Dietary Fibre Content, Non-fermented Dough and Bread Characteristics from Wheat and Wheat-Barley Flours. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis65(2), 727-736. doi: 10.11118/actaun201765020727
Download citation

References

  1. ADEBOWALE, A-R. A., EMMAMBUX, M. N., BEUKES, M. and TAYLOR, J. R. N. 2011. Fractionation and characterization of teff proteins. J. Cereal Sci., 54: 380 - 386. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2011.08.002 Go to original source...
  2. AHMED, J. 2015. Effect of barley β-glucan concentrate on oscillatory and creep behaviour of composite wheat flour dough. J. Food Eng., 152: 85 - 94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.11.018 Go to original source...
  3. ALAUNYTE, I., STOJCESKA, V., PLUNKETT, A., AINSWORTH, P. and DERBYSHIRE, E. 2012. Improving the quality of nutrient-rich teff (Eragrostis tef) breads by combination of enzymes in straight dough and sourdough breadmaking. J. Cereal Sci., 55: 22 - 30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2011.09.005 Go to original source...
  4. BAYE, K. 2014. Teff: nutrient composition and health benefits. Working Paper 67, Ethiopian Strategy Support Program. Addis Abeba, Ethiopia: EDRI and IFPRI. Avaialable at: http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/esspwp67.pdf [Accessed: 2014, November 14].
  5. CAMPO, E., DEL ARCO, L., URTASUN, L., ORIA, R. and FERRER-MAIRAL, A. 2015. Impact of sourdough on sensory properties and consumers' preference of gluten-free breads enriched with teff flour. J. Cereal Sci., 67: 75 - 82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2015.09.010 Go to original source...
  6. CHOI, I., LEE, M.-J., CHOI, J.-S., HYUN J.-N., PARK K.-H. and KIM K.-J. 2011. Bread quality by substituting normal and waxy hull-less barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) flours. Food Sci. Biotechnol., 20: 671 - 678. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-011-0095-5 Go to original source...
  7. EFSA 2011: Scientific opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to beta-glucans from oats and barley and maintenance of normal blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations (ID 1236, 1299), increase in satiety leading to a reduction in energy intake (ID 851, 852), reduction of post-prandial glycaemic responses (ID 821, 824), and "digestive function" (ID 850) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No. 1924/2006. EFSA Journal, 9(6): 2207. Go to original source...
  8. EL YAMLAHI, A. and OUHSSINE, M. 2013. Utilization of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) flour with common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) flour in bread-making. Ann. Biol. Res., 4: 119 - 129.
  9. GARCÍA PERIS, P. and CAMBLOR ALVAREZ, M. 1999. Dietary fiber: concept, classification and current indications. Nutri. Hosp., 14(Suppl. 2): 22S - 31S.
  10. HAGER, A.S., WOLTER, A., JACOB, F., ZANNINI, E. and ARENDT, E. K. 2012. Nutritional properties and ultra-structure of commercial gluten free flours from different botanical sources compared to wheat flours. J. Cereal Sci., 56: 239 - 47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2012.06.005 Go to original source...
  11. HRU©KOVÁ, M., ©VEC, I. and JURINOVÁ, I. 2013. Changes in baking quality of composite wheat/hemp flour detected by means of mixolab. Cereal Res. Comm., 41: 150 - 159. DOI: 10.1556/CRC.2012.0033 Go to original source...
  12. INGLETT, G. E., CHEN, D., LIU, S. X and LEE, S. 2014. Pasting and rheological properties of oat products dry-blended with ground chia seeds. LWT - Food Sci. Technol., 55: 148 - 156. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2013.07.011 Go to original source...
  13. KOLETTA, P., IRAKLI, M., PAPAGEORGIOU, M. and SKENDI, A. 2014. Physicochemical and technological properties of highly enriched wheat breads with wholegrain non-wheat flours. J. Cereal Sci., 60: 561 - 568. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2014.08.003 Go to original source...
  14. NOWOROLNIK, K., WIRKIJOWSKA, A. and MIKOS-SZYMANSKA, M. 2014. Effect of genotype and nitrogen fertilization on grain yield and quality of spring barley intended for health food use. Bulg. J. Agri. Sci., 20: 576 - 580.
  15. OHR, L. M. 2009. Good-for-you-grains. Food Technol., 63: 57 - 61.
  16. PSZCZOLA, D. E. 2012. Seeds of success. Food Technol., 66: 45 - 55. Go to original source...
  17. RØDBOTTEN, M., TOMIC, O., HOLTEKJØLEN, A. K., GRINI, I. S., LEA, P., GRANLI B. S., GRIMSBY, S. and SAHLSTRØM, S. 2015. Barley bread with normal and low content of salt; sensory profile and consumer preference in five European countries. J. Cereal Sci., 64: 176 - 182. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2015.05.001 Go to original source...
  18. STEFFOLANI, E., MARTINEZ M. M., LEÓN, A. E. and GÓMEZ, M. 2015. Effect of pre-hydration of chia (Salvia hispanica L.), seeds and flour on the quality of wheat flour breads. LWT - Food Science and Technol., 61: 401 - 406. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.12.056 Go to original source...
  19. SULLIVAN, P., O'FLAHERTY, J., BRUNTON, N., ARENDT, E. and GALLAGHER, E. 2010. Fundamental rheological and textural properties of doughs and breads produced from milled pearled barley flour. Eur. Food Res. Technol., 231: 441 - 453. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-010-1297-4 Go to original source...
  20. ©TERNA, V., ZUTE, S. and JĀKOBSONE, I. 2015. Grain composition and functional ingredients of barley varieties created in Latvia. Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of sciences. Section B, 69: 158 - 162. Go to original source...
  21. VERDÚ, S., VÁSQUEZ, F., IVORRA E., SÁNCHEZ, A. J., BARAT, J. M. and GRAU, R. 2015. Physicochemical effects of chia (Salvia hispanica) seed flour on each wheat bread-making process phase and product storage. J. Cereal Sci., 65: 67 - 73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2015.05.011 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.