Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2015, 63(6), 2077-2084 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563062077

SMEs Growth in the Czech Republic: Some Macroeconomic Perspectives

Christian Nedu Osakwe1, Nahanga Verter2, Věra Bečvářová2, Miloslava Chovancová1
1 Faculty of Economics and Management, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, nám. T. G. Masaryka 5555, 760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic
2 Department of Regional and Business Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are seen as a vehicle for employment generation, wealth creation, economic growth and development in countries that have a sound investment climate. SMEs, account for approximately one-third of GDP, over 50% of the value added, 99% of the share of total registered enterprises, and represent 60% of total employment in the Czech Republic. In the light of this background, the paper explores the influence of some macroeconomic variables on SMEs growth in the Czech Republic for the period 1995-2013. In order to assess the impacts of these critical macroeconomic variables (e.g., rate of unemployment, economic growth, credit provided by the financial sector) on SMEs growth, we employed an econometric technique. Our findings suggest a concave relationship between unemployment and SMEs growth in the Czech Republic. More precisely, it signifies that beyond a turning point, unemployment is likely to slow down SMEs growth in the country. Our results further hint at a positive relationship between economic growth and SMEs growth. However, our empirical estimates showed an insignificant relationship between domestic credit provided by the financial sector and SMEs growth in the country. The government of the Czech Republic should continue to provide an enabling investment climate and support for bolstering a sustainable SMEs development within the country. Similar to the extant literature, we have also implored the Czech government to do more with regard to the provision of easier access and affordable credits/loans to SMEs. We have also called for the reduction of bureaucratic bottlenecks that might have to do with SMEs legislations in the country.

Keywords: SMEs growth, unemployment, economic growth, finance, enterprises
Grants and funding:

The article received support from the Internal Grant Agency of FaME TBU in Zlín (IGA/FaME/2015/039), and IGA FRRMS MENDELU (No. 18/2015).

Prepublished online: December 26, 2015; Published: January 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Osakwe, C.N., Verter, N., Bečvářová, V., & Chovancová, M. (2015). SMEs Growth in the Czech Republic: Some Macroeconomic Perspectives. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis63(6), 2077-2084. doi: 10.11118/actaun201563062077
Download citation

References

  1. AHMAD, S. Z. 2012. Micro, small and medium-sized enterprises development in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: problems and constraints. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 8(4): 217-232. DOI: 10.1108/20425961211276606 Go to original source...
  2. ARDIC, P., MYLENKO, N. and SALTANE, V. 2012. Access to finance by small and medium enterprises: a cross-country analysis with a new data set. Pacific Economic Review, 17(4): 491-513. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0106.2012.00596.x Go to original source...
  3. AYYAGARI, M., BECK, T. and DEMIRGUC-KUNT, A. 2007. Small and medium enterprises across the globe. Small Business Economics, 29: 415-434. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-006-9002-5 Go to original source...
  4. BEKERIS, R. 2012. The impact of macroeconomic indicators upon SMEs profitability. Ekonomika, 91(3): 117-128. Go to original source...
  5. BERAN, V. and FRKOVÁ, J. 2003. Significance of SMEs in the Czech economy and supporting SMEs as an instrument of the regional development. Acta Polytechnica, 43(2): 44-49. Go to original source...
  6. CLIFTON, N., GÄRTNER, S. and REHFELD, D. 2011. Companies, cultures, and the region: interactions and outcomes. European Planning Studies, 19(11): 1857-1864. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2011.618683 Go to original source...
  7. CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE. 2014. Database of national accounts. [Data file]. Availableat: http://bit.ly/1fo5lH8.
  8. DASAN, P. 2013. Small & medium enterprise assessment in Czech Republic & Russia using marketing analytics methodology. Central European Business Review, 2(4): 39-49. DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.63 Go to original source...
  9. ENGLE, R. F. and GRANGER, C. W. J. 1987. Co-Integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2): 251-276. DOI: 10.2307/1913236 Go to original source...
  10. EVANS, D. S. and LEIGHTON, L. 1990. Small business formation by unemployed and employed workers. Small Business Economics, 2(4): 319-330. DOI: 10.1007/BF00401628 Go to original source...
  11. DIETRICH, A. 2010. Explaining loan rate differentials between small and large companies: evidence from Switzerland. Small Business Economics, 38: 481-94. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-010-9273-8 Go to original source...
  12. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2005. The new SME definition: user guide and model declaration. Luxembourg: European Commission.
  13. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2010. European SMEs under pressure: annual report on EU small and medium-sized enterprises 2009. Luxembourg: European Commission.
  14. FRITSCH, M. and MUELLER, P. 2004. The effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies, 38(8): 961-975. DOI: 10.1080/0034340042000280965 Go to original source...
  15. JASRA, J. M., KYAN, M. A., HUNJYA, A. I. et al. 2011. Determinants of business success of small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(20): 274-280.
  16. KUBÍČKOVÁ, L. and PROCHÁZKOVÁ, L. 2014. Success evaluation of small and medium-sized enterprises in terms of their participation in the internationalization process. E + M Ekonomie a Management, 17(2): 131-145. DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-010 Go to original source...
  17. LACINA, L. and VAVŘINA J. 2013. The impact of financial and economic crisis on SME's in Greece and Ireland. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun., 61(4): 1005-1016. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361041005 Go to original source...
  18. MATEEV, M. and ANASTASOV, Y. 2010. Determinants of small and medium sized fast growing enterprises in Central and Eastern Europe: a panel data analysis. Financial Theory and Practice, 34(3): 269-295.
  19. MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY AND TRADE. 2012. Small and medium enterprises support strategy 2014-2020. Prague: Ministry of Industry and Trade.
  20. MUKORERA, S. and MAHADEA, D. 2014. Linking entrepreneurial activity to economic meltdown in Zimbabwe. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3): 42-50. Go to original source...
  21. MULLER, P., GAGLIARDI, G., CALIANDRO, C. et al. 2014. A partial and fragile recovery: Annual report on European SMEs 2013/2014. Luxembourg: European Commission.
  22. OECD. 2010. High-growth enterprises: what governments can do to make a difference, OECD studies on SMEs and entrepreneurship. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  23. OECD. 2013. Financing SMEs and entrepreneurs 2013: An OECD scoreboard. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  24. PLEHN-DUJOWICH, J. M. and GROVE, W. 2012. The dynamic relationship between entrepreneurship, unemployment, and growth: evidence from U.S. Industries. Research Issues No. 394.
  25. PROCHÁZKOVÁ, L. and KUBÍČKOVÁ, L. 2012. The internationalization of SMEs operating in the engineering industry. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun., 60(2): 279-284. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201260020279 Go to original source...
  26. TABAS, J., BERANOVÁ, M. and MARTINOVIČOVÁ, D. 2012. Influence of product innovations on financial performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in the Czech Republic. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun., 60(7): 409-414. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201260070409 Go to original source...
  27. THURIK, R. 1999. The Dutch Polder Model: Shifting from the managed economy to the entrepreneurial economy. In: Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association New York. NY, January 3-5, 1999.
  28. VAN STEL, A., CARREE, M. and THURIK, Y. 2005. The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics, 24(3): 311-321. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-005-1996-6 Go to original source...
  29. VAN STEL, A., THURIK, R., HARTOG, C. et al. 2010. The two-way relationship between entrepreneurship and economic performance. Scales Research Reports. EIM Business and Policy Research (No. H200822).
  30. VERTER, N. and OSAKWE, C N. 2015. Market competitiveness of the Czech economy in the era of globalization: Some new empirical insights. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1): 268-277. Go to original source...
  31. WALCZAK, D. and VOSS, G. 2013. New possibilities of supporting Polish SMEs within the Jeremie initiative managed by BGK. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(9): 759-765. Go to original source...
  32. WENNEKERS, S., VAN STEL, A., THURIK, R. et al. 2005. Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24(3): 293-309. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-005-1994-8 Go to original source...
  33. YUSUF, T. O. and DANSU, F. S. 2013. SMES, business risks and sustainability in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(9): 76-94.
  34. ZAPLETALOVÁ, S. 2014. The internationalization process of Czech companies. International Business Management, 8(6): 361-368.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.