Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2013, 61(7), 2779-2785 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361072779
Gaining competitive advantage through business analytics
- The Stern Stewart Institute, 80333 Munich, Germany
The industry for business analytics within the BI sphere is growing significantly and the distinction in organizations between transactional information systems and decision-oriented systems breaks down. Firms need to understand both the opportunity and the potential of business analytics. Reporting, which is getting a handle on what happened in organizations, is complemented by analytics that is rather explanatory and predictive. Leveraging business analytics means to use analytics applications in order to analyse business problems and produce related business recommendations to improve business process performance. Business analytics must but be a part of a value creating process operating together with other systems and organisational factors in a synergistic manner, including people, processes, knowledge and relationship assets, culture, structure, and policies. In order for companies to be efficient, they need to automate processes, workflows and make rules. Effectiveness, on the other hand, is about making better decisions, perhaps using the same data that their competitors may have. What matters is not necessarily the technologies deployed, but emerging competence that the firm uses to support its business. A specific "mindset" needs to be installed for companies to invest into business analytics. Organisations need to better understand how best to exploit their data and convert them into information and sense-making capabilities. Business capabilities can be enhanced not only by exploitation of analytical tools, but also by the sophisticated use of information. This leads to a truly sense-making capability or "analytical mindset". The primary data covers 398 data sets, where firms have been asked about the specifics of their information management. The data is used as input to statistical tests and the value of business analytics is being analyzed in an empirical way.
Keywords: business intelligence, business analytics, predictive analytics, big data, competitive advantage, business objectives, enterprise performance, value creation, analytical capabilities
Grants and funding:
The qualitative data set is the output of research on the topic of business analytics in collaboration with IBM Institute for Business Value.
Received: April 11, 2013; Published: December 24, 2013 Show citation
References
- ARNOTT, D. and PERVAN, G., 2008: Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline, Decision Support Systems, 44, 3: 657-672. ISSN 0167-9236. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2007.09.003
Go to original source...
- DAVENPORT, T. H., HARRIS, J. G. and MORISON, R., 2010: Analytics at Work. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Publishing, pp. 6-8. ISBN 978-1-422-17769-3.
- DHILLON, G., 2008: Organizational competence for harnessing IT: A case study, Information & Management, 45, 5: 297-303. ISSN 0378-7206. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2008.01.008
Go to original source...
- EVELSON, B., 2008: The Forrester Wave: Enterprise Business Intelligence Platforms, Q3 2008', Forrester Research, Published on: July 31, 2008. [cit. 2013-04-10]. Cited from http://www.sas.com/news/analysts/forresterwave_bi_0708.pdf.
- GARTNER, 2010: Clarifying the Many Meanings of "Analytics", ID Number: G00175324, Publication Date: 31 March 2010. [cit. 2013-04-10]. Cited from http://insight.datamaticstech.com/dtlsp/confirmit/Gartner/10131/31march.pdf.
- GOLFARELLI, M.; RIZZI, S. and CELLA, I., 2004: Beyond Data Warehousing: What's Next in Business Intelligence?, DOLAP '04, Proceedings of the 7th ACM international workshop on Data warehousing and OLAP, November 2004. New York, NY, USA: ACM (Association for Computing Machinery), pp. 1-6. ISBN 1-58113-977-2.
Go to original source...
- HAMEL, G. and PRAHALAD, C. K., 1993: The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, 86, 3: 79-92. ISSN 0017-8012.
- HAN, J. and KAMBER, M., 2006: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, 2nd edition. Waltham, MA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 23-32. ISBN 1-55860-901-6.
- HOWSON, C., 2006: Seven Pillars of BI Success, Information Week, Published on: 28 August 2006. [cit. 2013-04-10]. Cited from http://www.informationweek.com/software/business-intelligence/the-seven-pillars-of-bi-success/191902420.
- INMON, B., 2005: A Brief History of Architecture, Information Management, Published on: 1 April 2005, [cit. 2013-04-10]. Cited from http://www.information-management.com/issues/20050401/1023908-1.html.
- JOURDAN, Z., RAINER, R. K. and MARSHALL, T. E., 2008: Business Intelligence: An Analysis of the Literature, Information Systems Management, 25, 2: 121-131. ISSN 1058-0530. DOI: 10.1080/10580530801941512
Go to original source...
- KOHAVI, R., ROTHLEDER, N. J. and SIMOUDIS, E., 2002: Emerging Trends in Business Analytics, Communications of the ACM, 45, 8: 45-48. ISSN 0001-0782. DOI: 10.1145/545151.545177
Go to original source...
- KOHLI, R. and GROVER, V., 2008: Business Value of IT: An Essay on Expanding Research Directions to Keep up with the Times, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9, 1: 23-39. ISSN 1536-9323. DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00147
Go to original source...
- KOVALERCHUK, B. and VITYAEV, E., 2008: Symbolic methodology for numeric data mining, Intelligent Data Analysis, 12, 2: 165-188. ISSN 1088-467X. DOI: 10.3233/IDA-2008-12203
Go to original source...
- MCGRATH, R. G., MACMILLAN, I. C. and VENKATRAMAN, S., 1995: Defining and developing competence: A strategic process paradigm, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 4: 251-275. ISSN 1097-0266. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250160402
Go to original source...
- MELVILLE, N., KRAEMER, K. and GURBAXANI, V., 2004: Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value, MIS Quarterly, 28, 2: 283-322. ISSN 0276-7783. DOI: 10.2307/25148636
Go to original source...
- MIRANI, R. and LEDERER, A. L., 1998: An Instrument for Assessing the Organizational Benefits of IS Projects, Decision Sciences, 29, 4: 803-838. ISSN 1540-5915. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb00878.x
Go to original source...
- RAI, A., PATNAYAKUNI, R. and PATNAYAKUNI, N., 2006: Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities, MIS Quarterly, 30, 2: 225-246. ISSN 0276-7783. DOI: 10.2307/25148729
Go to original source...
- SUBRAMANYAM, R. B. V. and GOSWAMI, A., 2005: A Fuzzy Data Mining Algorithm for Incremental Mining of Quantitative Sequential Patterns, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness & Knowledge-Based Systems, 13, 6: 633-652. ISSN 0218-4885. DOI: 10.1142/S0218488505003722
Go to original source...
- WILLIAMS, S., 2004: Assessing BI Readiness: A Key to BI ROI, Business Intelligence Journal, 9, 3: 15-24. ISSN 1918-2325.
- WILLIAMS, S. and WILLIAMS, N., 2006: The Profit Impact of Business Intelligence, San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 31-35. ISBN 978-0-123-72499-1.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.