Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2008, 56(2), 299-302 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun200856020299

Předběžné výsledky hodnocení rezistence podnoží pro révu vinnou k chloróze vyvolané vápníkem

Pavel Pavloušek
Ústav vinohradnictví a vinařství, Mendelova zemědělská a lesnická universita v Brně, Valtická 337, 691 44 Lednice, Česká republika

Odolnost k chloróze vyvolané vápníkem je velmi významnou vlastností podnoží. Chloróza vyvolávaná vápnem ovlivňuje kvalitu a výnos hroznů. Hodnocení odolnosti k chloróze je proto významné pro pěstování révy vinné a šlechtění. Cílem práce je získat výsledky hodnocení odolnosti podnožových odrůd révy vinné k chloróze. Výsledkem byly statisticky významné rozdíly mezi podnožovými odrůdami. Nejvyšší odolnost ukázala podnož Fercal. Podnože registrované ve Státní odrůdové knize v České republice je možné seřadit v následujícím pořadí od nejodolnější k nejvíce citlivé: Craciunel 2 - SO 4 - Kober 125 AA - Kober 5 BB - Teleki 5 C - Amos - LE-K-1.

réva vinná, podnož, odolnost, vápno, chloróza

Preliminary results of tests of grapevine rootstocks resistance to lime-induced chlorosis

Resistance to lime-induced chlorosis is very important characteristic of grapevine rootstocks. Lime-induced chlorosis influence yield and quality of grapes. Evaluation of chlorosis resistance is very important for grape growing and breeding. The aim of this work is provide results of evaluation grapevine rootstocks to chlorosis. High resistance was show in Fercal. From the viewpoint of the resistance to chlorosis, the rootstocks registered in the State Variety Book of the Czech Republic can be ranked from the most resistant to the most sensitive as follows: Craciunel 2 - SO 4 - Kober 125 AA - Kober 5 BB - Teleki 5 C - Amos - LE-K-1.

Keywords: grapevine, rootstock, resistance, lime, chlorosis
Grants and funding:

My sincere thanks for support belong to Czech Republic Ministry of Agriculture. This publication arose as a part of research project QF 4141: Grape rootstock breeding with use of grape genetic resources and modern testing methods. This research project was solved within the framework of the Theme 3.1, Use of the Genetic resources in Modern Applications; Priority 3.1.4. Improvement of the Biological Potential of Plants and Animals.

Received: December 10, 2007; Published: November 14, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pavloušek, P. (2008). Preliminary results of tests of grapevine rootstocks resistance to lime-induced chlorosis. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 56(2), 299-302. doi: 10.11118/actaun200856020299
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. BAVARESCO, L., FRASCHINI, P., PERINO, A., 1993: Effect of the rootstock on occurrence of lime-induced chlorosis of potted Vitis vinifera L. cv. "Pinot blanc". Plant and Soil, 157, 305-311. DOI: 10.1007/BF00011058 Go to original source...
    2. BAVARESCO, L., FREGONI, M., PERINO, A., 1994: Physiological aspects of lime-induced chlorosis in some Vitis species. I: pot trial on calcareous soil. Vitis, 33, 123-126.
    3. BAVARESCO, L., PRESUTTO, P., CIVARDI, S., 2005: VR O43-43: A lime-susceptible rootstock. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 56, 192-195. Go to original source...
    4. CHAUVET, M., REYNIER, A., 1979: Manuel de Viticulture, Bailiere, Paris, Francie.
    5. FREGONI, M., 1980: Criteri di scelta dei portinnesti nella viticoltura mondiale. Vignevini, 5, 31-38.
    6. GALET, P., 1988: Cépages et Vignobles de France. Tome 1. Les Vignes Américanes, C. Dehán, Paris.
    7. IPGRI, 1997: Descriptors for grapevine (Vitis spp.). 62 p.
    8. KOCSIS, L., LEHOCZKY, E., BAKONYI, L., SZABA, L., SZÖKE, L., 1998: New lime - and drought tolerant grape rootstock variety. Acta Horticulturae, 473, 75-82. Go to original source...
    9. KSOURI, R., GHARSALLI, M., LACHAAL, M., 2005: Physiological responses of Tunisian grapevine varieties to bicarbonate-induced iron deficiency. Journal of Plant Physiology, 162, 335-341. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.06.011 Go to original source...
    10. OSTROVSKAYA, L. K., TRUCH, V. V., MIKHAILIK, O. M., 1990: Superoxide dismutase activation in response to lime-induced chlorosis. New Phytol., 114, 39-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00371.x Go to original source...
    11. POUGET, R., 1980: Breeding Grapevine Rootstocks for Resistance to Iron chlorosis. In. Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Grapevine Breeding. Davis, USA. 191-197.
    12. SARACCO, C. Guida del viticoltore. 1992, Edagricole Bologna, Itálie.
    13. VIALA, P., VERMOREL, V., 1910: Traite Générale de Viticulture. Ampélographie, Masson et Cie, Paris.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content